Thursday, May 20, 2010

The Naming of Things


I've been mulling over the name changing question for a while now and as often seems to be the case for me the more I think about it the less sure I am. My initial thoughts were something along the lines of "NO. No no no no no. I am not changing my name. No way. It's mine. It's who I am. NO." I think I was initially so opposed to changing my name because I saw it as a visible part of the act of subjugation that marriage used to be for some women. I wasn't willing to lose something, my name, because I was getting married. I thought that marriage should be about strengthening a partnership between two individuals, not turning two people into one. Actually, writing this I'm starting to feel this way again, part of me is screaming out "Don't give an inch! You have to fight for this to be a fair and equal union!". In a wider sense this might be true, women still seem to give more up in a marriage, but I don't think our marriage will be this way, so perhaps my fighting attitude is misplaced here.

Another part of me sees this marriage as creating a new family, and it will feel more like it's our new family if we have the same name, but maybe a new name would be best for a new family? The issue with some kind of combination is that Arthur's family name is already double-barrelled, so we can't just stick our names together and be done with it. If we took my name and half of his then that would feel unfair because he would be loosing a bit of his name and I would only be adding to mine. I thought about putting both of our mum's maiden names together, but as Arthur pointed out that sounds like a cowboy's name...really, it doesn't sound good.

Then there's the traditional I take his name scenario, but I really don't think that's for me. It just has too many connotations of imbalanced gender relations, and it wouldn't fairly represent our marriage. The option I'm leaning towards at the moment is taking my mum's maiden name and the second half of his family name to make a new name. That way we're both giving up our unmarried names to make a new one, but it has elements from both of our families, so there's some history to it. His family name has only been double-barrelled for a couple of generations anyway, and the first part was just a middle name tacked on to sound fancier or something so I don't think he'd be too bothered about loosing it. If we did this we could start the tradition of girls taking the matrilineal name into marriage and boys taking the patrilineal name, which appeals to me. Of course it might not appeal to our children, but at least they would have the option.

In short I don't think I'm really decided yet, I hope it doesn't come down to whatever I feel on the day. I suppose if that's the case I should just keep my name until I'm sure because It's a lot of paperwork to change everything. It's funny that the 'A rose by any other name...' argument doesn't seem to apply here for me. I mean what's in a name really? Not an awful lot, but it feels incredibly important right now. More thought is needed I fear, or perhaps I shouldn't fear, it's motivating some useful relationship thinking after all, and that is an end in itself.

Monday, May 10, 2010

Trusted sources


I stumbled across a link to sign up to receive emails from the 'Rough Guide to Weddings' people on the Rough Guide facebook page today. Now, I really like Rough Guides, I think the writing is well informed, balanced and useful, but the first weddingy email I received really didn't come across that way. I know I didn't have to sign up for said emails so I can't really complain, but I really thought Rough Guides might have something intelligent to say on the matter. Oh no. The very first thing they have to say is this:


"Money matters"

"Love may be free, but weddings cost money - lots of it. Whatever your total budget, here's a likely breakdown of the costs:

  • Food & drink: 40%
  • Music: 8%
  • Clothes & rings: 13%
  • Stationery: 3%
  • Photos/video: 12%
  • Gifts: 3%
  • Reception venue: 8%
  • Ceremony: 3%
  • Flowers: 8%
  • Transport & parking: 2% "

Are they completely mad? Okay, granted, the fact that presumably they got this from some genuine statistics is what is really insane about this. (Um hello? Spending the same amount of money on stationary as on your WEDDING CEREMONY? This is not cool with me.) But what really made me fume was that this is what they chose as the first thing to share with potential customers. They are trying to sell their book, fair enough, but why is it that the only way we seem to be sold things now is through negativity? What might have inclined me to buy their book, or at least see if it was in the Library, is something positive. Some advice that made me feel happy about getting married, not a list of how much money everybody else spends! Our whole consumer culture is based on companies feeding off our insecurities, from cleaning products that imply you might kill your baby if you don't use them to 'anti'-aging creams and just about any cosmetic you care to mention, but I really thought Rough Guides were better than that.

It seems, when it comes to weddings, publishers are like your nearest and dearest; some people/publishers who are usually very sensible and give very sound advice turn into chiffon crazed spendaholics when you mention the 'W' word. Of course I haven't read the book and it could be that it gives very useful advice, but judging by the email I'm going to guess not.

I suppose the only thing to do is take pleasure in the fact that so far our 'stationary' costs are £7.99 on a box of 100 penguin book cover postcards which we're going to use as invites, and I think that will be it. So based on their table our wedding is going to cost £266.33. Awesome!

Friday, May 07, 2010

Staying healthy


I've let myself get ill this week by over filling my schedule and forgoing sleep to try and get things done. I really need to not do this in the run up to the wedding, I wonder if people having to call their wedding's off because they're ill is a surprisingly common occurance?

Monday, May 03, 2010

Vision


Yesterday I let myself skive off revising for a test I have coming up by composing a wedding mood board. I got really excited sharing it with Arth over skype because we had such a clear vision of how we were going to make this day true to us that it felt like we were there already. Getting a vision of marrying in my head that really makes me happy has been something of a battle for me, so arriving at this point has made me want to write about how I got here. I say ‘I’ because I think I have been the crazy one in this process, the one who got lost in the middle, and now Arth and I are back together in sane wedding planning land I want to dissect my craziness.

I think it’s important to explain at this stage, mostly so I don’t come across as entirely crazy, that our engagement is looong. I got the opportunity to go and study in New Zealand for a year which pretty much removed the possibility of getting married in either of the first two summers after we got engaged. We knew we wanted to get married in the summer so we could be outside, so we’ve ended up with what will be a two and a half year engagement. Not so long in the grand scheme of things but it seems like a long time when you really want to get married RIGHT NOW!

Despite the fact that when we got engaged it was more than two years until the date we’d decided on part of me wanted to start planning this wedding from day one. Actually, more accurately, about 3 months before we officially got engaged which was when I think we’d decided that this was IT. Now I am not a weddingy person. I have said surprisingly recently that marriage is just a piece of paper, I have never planned my dream wedding in my head, I was always the groom when my sister and I dressed up to play weddings. This meant it came as something of a shock to me that not only did I want to get married, but I was actually thinking about dresses and flowers and colours, things I’d have previously scoffed at. The first few months I definitely got sucked in by the wedding industry, I was trying to keep true to myself but this was expressed in a very stilted manner. I was imagining bridesmaids in different shades of the same colour (gasp), a tea length wedding dress instead of a gown (god forbid), you get the picture. I was knocked completely off kilter by the plethora of people out there trying to sell you what a wedding ‘should be’ . While I had entered into the commitment to marry with a very untraditional vision of what our marriage will be, I was suddenly entertaining a surprisingly traditional view of how we would marry. What I didn’t manage in those first few months was to really think about this day reflecting what marrying meant to us, to consider how I felt about marrying as the guiding force behind my imaginings rather than a pretty picture that somebody somewhere was trying to sell.

Cue the blogosphere. Reading blogs written by sane people really helped bring me back down to earth (as I’ve mentioned), and that, combined with Arthur being much more level headed than me, has allowed me to find sane wedding planning mode. You know, the one where you focus on actually getting married and you remember you’ve never cared about shoes/salt and pepper shakers that would make cute cake toppers/what colour clothes your friends wear/whatever else you’re obsessing over this much before, so why now? I suppose it makes no sense to end a post with a moodboard in it, something that is very visual and superficial (and actually includes afore mentioned cake toppers), saying I’m in sane wedding planning mode. I’m looking at the moodboard as a way of explaining our vision to interested parties, I think it captures what we want from the day and hopefully it will help people to ‘get it’. Getting the images organised has let me get an overall feel for my ideas without focusing on particular details that we MUST have. Who knows, but it makes me smile.

Expectations

The smiley day we got engaged

I've called this blog an unexpected wedding because the fact that planning a wedding was not in my plan has really influenced how the process has gone for me (so far). At first the fact that all this wedding malarkey is a mystery to me meant that I felt very insecure about the whole thing. Faced by the overwhelming volume of nasty commercial wedding propaganda I unwittingly found myself absorbing, my first instinct was to call the whole thing off, seriously. It took a few scary late night 'are we really going to do this' conversations with my betrothed and some tears before I realised that it was the wedding I wanted to back out of, not the marriage. My other half has been much more sensible about the whole thing than me, and much better at thinking about getting married in the context of what our marriage will be, not what other people's are.

The other thing that has brought me back on the straight and narrow as far as wedding sanity is concerned is reading other peoples blogs, which is why I'm sharing this, though I'm not sure I'm a voice of reason just yet. Reading words of wisdom from people who care about their marriages more than their weddings and about having fun more than matching their bridesmaids to their napkins or whatever we're all supposed to be doing, has really helped. I've also got inspiration from seeing how other people did their real weddings, and I've ended up feeling that it is possible to celebrate our love without making a spectacle of it.

After the dust has settled on my temporary wedding induced insanity I've come to appreciate my lack of expectations about this wedding. Though having no starting point left me a bit lost at first, now that I've finally remembered what we really want it means that I can choose my own expectations. We're choosing to expect a day surrounded by the people we love where people can have fun, share food and catch up. Of course now that we've got our expectations it's quickly becoming apparent that our families have other ideas, but at least we know what we want. That's step one.

How we met



Arthur and I met when we both signed up for a charity hitchhike to Paris, his friend couldn't go on the same weekend he could so we ended up getting paired together. We got stuck in Dover and then Dunkerque but made it to Paris in just over 26 hours (We live in Bath, UK). A couple of weeks later we went on a date, and within three months we were talking marriage. Two years later we're in the process of planning our wedding, although I'm on the other side of the world studying this year, so things are hard sometimes. Our relationship has surprised both of us, neither of us had marriage in mind, but almost as soon as we met we knew we wanted it. I'm not where I expected I'd be, but I'm so happy, and glad.