
I've been mulling over the name changing question for a while now and as often seems to be the case for me the more I think about it the less sure I am. My initial thoughts were something along the lines of "NO. No no no no no. I am not changing my name. No way. It's mine. It's who I am. NO." I think I was initially so opposed to changing my name because I saw it as a visible part of the act of subjugation that marriage used to be for some women. I wasn't willing to lose something, my name, because I was getting married. I thought that marriage should be about strengthening a partnership between two individuals, not turning two people into one. Actually, writing this I'm starting to feel this way again, part of me is screaming out "Don't give an inch! You have to fight for this to be a fair and equal union!". In a wider sense this might be true, women still seem to give more up in a marriage, but I don't think our marriage will be this way, so perhaps my fighting attitude is misplaced here.
Another part of me sees this marriage as creating a new family, and it will feel more like it's our new family if we have the same name, but maybe a new name would be best for a new family? The issue with some kind of combination is that Arthur's family name is already double-barrelled, so we can't just stick our names together and be done with it. If we took my name and half of his then that would feel unfair because he would be loosing a bit of his name and I would only be adding to mine. I thought about putting both of our mum's maiden names together, but as Arthur pointed out that sounds like a cowboy's name...really, it doesn't sound good.
Then there's the traditional I take his name scenario, but I really don't think that's for me. It just has too many connotations of imbalanced gender relations, and it wouldn't fairly represent our marriage. The option I'm leaning towards at the moment is taking my mum's maiden name and the second half of his family name to make a new name. That way we're both giving up our unmarried names to make a new one, but it has elements from both of our families, so there's some history to it. His family name has only been double-barrelled for a couple of generations anyway, and the first part was just a middle name tacked on to sound fancier or something so I don't think he'd be too bothered about loosing it. If we did this we could start the tradition of girls taking the matrilineal name into marriage and boys taking the patrilineal name, which appeals to me. Of course it might not appeal to our children, but at least they would have the option.
In short I don't think I'm really decided yet, I hope it doesn't come down to whatever I feel on the day. I suppose if that's the case I should just keep my name until I'm sure because It's a lot of paperwork to change everything. It's funny that the 'A rose by any other name...' argument doesn't seem to apply here for me. I mean what's in a name really? Not an awful lot, but it feels incredibly important right now. More thought is needed I fear, or perhaps I shouldn't fear, it's motivating some useful relationship thinking after all, and that is an end in itself.




